Epistemology for the Feldenkrais Method

Authors

  • Carl Ginsburg PhD

Keywords:

Feldenkrais Method, case study, epistemology, experience, research outcomes, evaluation, observation, scientific method

Abstract

This article reflects on the experiential impact of a Feldenkrais Method lesson for a client and the difficulties in describing and evaluating these changes of feelings and/or self-perception. The importance of including in research observations these experiential aspects of our practice, alongside classic scientific methodologies, is presented. Especially important are the surprising observations that occur as a consequence of the empirical approach used in our practice. These observations need to be taken seriously by researchers, psychologists, medical practitioners, etc. and investigated in more detail. How can we demonstrate them to others and how can we induce researchers to look into our questions? We need research that excites and expands the basis of what we do.

Author Biography

Carl Ginsburg, PhD

Carl Ginsburg taught in and later directed professional training groups for people interested in becoming Feldenkrais practitioners for 30 years. He studied directly with Moshe Feldenkrais during his first North American training program held in San Francisco from 1975 to 1977. During his training with Moshe Feldenkrais, he began writing about the Feldenkrais Method,drawing on his experience with a number of somatic (mind-body) practices, and his background in science. Carl also served as a past president of the Feldenkrais Guild, and was involved for many years with the Shake-A-Leg Program.

Downloads

Published

2008-01-01

How to Cite

Ginsburg, C. (2008). Epistemology for the Feldenkrais Method. Feldenkrais Research Journal, 4. Retrieved from https://feldenkraisresearchjournal.org/index.php/journal/article/view/128

Issue

Section

Articles